On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 17:57, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1) I stand corrected, I misinterpreted the phonebook (I watched on bold > records only), so your calculation was correct. Sorry for that.
Entries in bold are ASF members. > > which was only started 19 hours ago > > "vote count != consensus", and the key we seek is consensus (e.g. > agreement). > For instance, if the tally is like +5 -2, then, it is up to somebody (vote > starter?) > to decide if there's an agreement indeed. > > >VOTE threads at JMeter > > (un)fortunately, there are only a few active committers/PMCs, so we just > vote fast, and we know no new votes would appear. > > >voting [1] applies to the VOTE thread? > > I guess it is up to the one who starts the thread. > If you mention "lazy consensus", it becomes lazy. > If you mention "votes are open for 365 days", then it becomes 365 day vote > :) > > Vladimir
