Seems like we have enough votes to complete this release. Davyd, would you like 
to close the vote?
--
Matt Sicker

> On Dec 25, 2021, at 14:50, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 6:35 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> I checked the signature and hashes and those look good.
>> 
>> I unzipped the source and binaries. The appropriate license and notice
>> files are present.
>> 
>> I did not perform tests as I don’t have the necessary tools installed.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 23, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Root keys are in https://downloads.apache.org/logging/KEYS which is in
>>> the dist repository where you commit releases.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:03 AM Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> * old-log4net.snk.gpg has been the old key to sign binaries.
>>>> * @Matt, where is the root logging KEYS file located?
>>>> 
>>>> The changes in the release look good to me. +1
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 07:34, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks Matt
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since you've given a +1, I'll write up some sticky notes to address
>> these
>>>>> points in the near future.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -d
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On December 19, 2021 23:51:45 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Notes on the release:
>>>>>> * I’ve copied your release signing key to the root logging KEYS file
>> for
>>>>>> easier discoverability.
>>>>>> * The copyright year in the NOTICE file is a few years out of date at
>>>>> this
>>>>>> point. I’ve updated this in master, though you’ll want to update this
>>>>> again
>>>>>> in a couple weeks when it’s outdated again.
>>>>>> * Some included files in the base directory of the source zip are
>>>>> missing
>>>>>> copyright headers or shouldn’t even be included in the tarball (e.g.,
>>>>> the
>>>>>> appveyor config file probably isn’t necessary)
>>>>>> - Not sure what old-log4net.snk.gpg is in there for, either.
>>>>>> - Gulp task source files missing headers
>>>>>> * Artifact signatures and sha512 hashes look good (checked with shasum
>>>>>> which is the Perl script version), contain appropriate LICENSE and
>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>>> (besides the outdated copyright year, but not a blocker), no binaries
>> in
>>>>>> the source zip, appropriate files in the binary zip.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 16, 2021, at 07:47, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'd like to raise a vote to release log4net 2.0.14. Changelog is up
>> on
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> pre-release page at
>>>>>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.14-rc1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have updated staging docs and I _think_ I've done the right thing
>> with
>>>>>>> respect to getting binaries and source up to the dev repo at
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging, but the download
>> links
>>>>> on
>>>>>>> the staging docs point to the release download area, so I'm not sure
>> if
>>>>> I
>>>>>>> should rather upload there so that staging documentation "works as
>>>>>>> expected" for the vote to continue.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks Ralph for assisting me in being able to uplodate artifacts
>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>> Much appreciated.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -d
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> PS. This email is a duplicate of the one sent from my work email (
>>>>>>> davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za) which I believe has been lost somewhere
>>>>> along the
>>>>>>> way. Please ignore the other if it pops up.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>>>> If you say that getting the money is the most important thing
>>>>>>> You will spend your life completely wasting your time
>>>>>>> You will be doing things you don't like doing
>>>>>>> In order to go on living
>>>>>>> That is, to go on doing things you don't like doing
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Which is stupid.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Alan Watts
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gXTZM_uPMY
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. *
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Dominik Psenner
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to