+1

commits OK
sigs OK
hashes OK
`./mvnw clean verify apache-rat:check` OK on

$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_312"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Zulu 8.58.0.13-CA-linux64) (build
1.8.0_312-b07)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Zulu 8.58.0.13-CA-linux64) (build 25.312-b07,
mixed mode)

$ uname -a
Linux tahta 5.11.0-43-generic #47~20.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Mon Dec 13 11:06:56
UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:03 AM Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.12.4, a security release for Java 7
> users.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1, don't release because…
>
> The vote will remain open for as short amount as time as required to vet
> the release. All votes are welcome and we encourage everyone to test the
> release, but only Logging PMC votes are “officially” counted. As always, at
> least 3 +1 votes and more positive than negative votes are required.
>
> Changes in this version include:
>
> Fixed Bugs
>
>         • LOG4J2-3293: JdbcAppender now uses JndiManager to access JNDI
> resources. JNDI is only enabled when system property log4j2.enableJndiJdbc
> is set to true.
>
> Tag:
> a)  for a new copy do "git clone
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2.git"; and then "git checkout
> tags/log4j-2.12.4-rc1”  or just "git clone -b log4j-2.12.4-rc1
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2.git";
> b) for an existing working copy to “git pull” and then “git checkout
> tags/log4j-2.12.4-rc1”
>
> Web Site:  https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/log4j-2.12.4/index.html
>
> Maven Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1080
>
> Distribution archives:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j/
>
> You may download all the Maven artifacts by executing:
> wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=7 -nH -r -p -np --no-check-certificate
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1080/org/apache/logging/log4j/
> .
>
> Ralph

Reply via email to