> On Sep 12, 2022, at 2:52 AM, Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > > Totally agreed with all the points! > > I would like to extend this a bit more: > > * switch to CI-friendly versions via ${revision} I don’t understand this. What is a “CI-friendly version”. What do you mean by ${revision}. Surely all dependencies can’t use the same version number. > * group properties by domain (e.g., common, lib versions, plugin versions) > and lexicographically sort each group I am all for making properties easy to find. However, just sorting them is probably enough. But I have no objection to grouping them. Ralph
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structure Matt Sicker
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structure Volkan Yazıcı
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structure Piotr P. Karwasz
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structure Volkan Yazıcı
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structu... Piotr P. Karwasz
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test str... Matt Sicker
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test... Ralph Goers
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x`... Matt Sicker
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test str... Volkan Yazıcı
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structu... Ralph Goers
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structure Ralph Goers
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structu... Piotr P. Karwasz
- Re: Sync `master` and `release-2.x` test structure Piotr P. Karwasz
- Dependency management style Piotr P. Karwasz
- Re: Dependency management style Volkan Yazıcı
- Re: Dependency management style Matt Sicker