Hi Ralph, On Sun, 18 Sept 2022 at 01:30, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I would suggest that if you bump the logging parent to use it and then test > Log4j > with it and get a successful build then just do it. We don’t need to discuss > stuff like > this if it works.
The upgrade required adding a couple of automatic module names to artifacts that didn't have them. Otherwise it passes the tests (also `./mvnw site`): https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/1063 The builds are finally reproducible (I tested on the `log4j-api` JAR). Ralph, could you release `logging-parent` version 6? Piotr
