I asked some people in infra how we should handle our site since it’s currently a huge git repo. There was a suggestion of using the nightlies site publishing area with a CNAME which might work. Otherwise, we need to look at what other PMCs are doing with multi-version websites.
— Matt Sicker > On Oct 9, 2022, at 13:13, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > +0. I really don’t care. However, I would only be in favor of switch > master/main/whatever to be the default if we are going to create a release. > > Personally, I’d prefer to be discussing how we are going to change the web > site to support both 2.x and 3.x releases and make a plan to get the web site > build under control. > > Ralph > >> On Oct 9, 2022, at 10:04 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Matt, >> >>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 18:27, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> (...) This is more of a universal sorting issue than just the GitHub UI >>> (think git itself, or gitbox, or any external tooling). >> >> You are right, I tried the git executable, Eclipse and GitHub and they >> all seem to use lexicographic order in the C locale. The only >> differences are: >> >> * git sorts `2.12.x > 2.3.x > 2.x` as expected, >> * Eclipse (JGit?) uses `2.3.x > 2.12.x > 2.x`, >> * GitHub sorts numerical as `2.x > 2.3.x > 2.12.x`. >> >> Anyway we should use names that are ordered before all the >> `dependabot` branches: e.g. let them start with a capital letter. >> >> Piotr >
