I asked some people in infra how we should handle our site since it’s currently 
a huge git repo. There was a suggestion of using the nightlies site publishing 
area with a CNAME which might work. Otherwise, we need to look at what other 
PMCs are doing with multi-version websites.

—
Matt Sicker

> On Oct 9, 2022, at 13:13, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
> +0. I really don’t care. However, I would only be in favor of switch 
> master/main/whatever to be the default if we are going to create a release.
> 
> Personally, I’d prefer to be discussing how we are going to change the web 
> site to support both 2.x and 3.x releases and make a plan to get the web site 
> build under control.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Oct 9, 2022, at 10:04 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Matt,
>> 
>>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 18:27, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> (...) This is more of a universal sorting issue than just the GitHub UI 
>>> (think git itself, or gitbox, or any external tooling).
>> 
>> You are right, I tried the git executable, Eclipse and GitHub and they
>> all seem to use lexicographic order in the C locale. The only
>> differences are:
>> 
>> * git sorts `2.12.x > 2.3.x > 2.x` as expected,
>> * Eclipse (JGit?) uses `2.3.x > 2.12.x > 2.x`,
>> * GitHub sorts numerical as `2.x > 2.3.x > 2.12.x`.
>> 
>> Anyway we should use names that are ordered before all the
>> `dependabot` branches: e.g. let them start with a capital letter.
>> 
>> Piotr
> 

Reply via email to