Can't we simply create a `log4j-[test-]junit` module containing the tooling
accepted for public consumption and stop deploying the rest of the `*-test`
modules?

On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, 16:51 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> FWIW,
>
> I reply on some of the test framework like JUnit rules in work projects, it
> would be lame to have to reinvent the wheel.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, 08:41 Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote:
>
> > I am concerned that users rely on test modules intended for internal
> usage.
> > I would rather skip all `*-test` modules during deployment. I am not
> > against shiping testing utilities for public consumption. But, AFAIC,
> these
> > modules were never intended for that purpose. This might bite us in the
> > long run since users would expect backward compatibility, which I expect
> to
> > be notably broken (for test modules!) in 3.0 release anyway.
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: <jeffrey.tho...@t-systems.com>
> > Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022, 15:58
> > Subject: AW: ETA for 2.19.1?
> > To: <log4j-u...@logging.apache.org>
> >
> >
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > Thanks for the answer. 😊
> >
> > Yeah not a lot of fixes (one was for me) but it seems there was a major
> > refactoring of test-code into standalone JARs...
> >
> > I just discovered the Junit hooks and have been using them out in my test
> > code - nice way of testing logging with a clean context.
> >
> > With 2.19.1 I wouldn't need to go back and change the dependencies again
> > later... 😊  But I can still get at them with the current 2.19.0
> > "log4j-core:tests" dependency.
> >
> > Cheers, Jeff
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. November 2022 16:39
> > An: Log4J Users List <log4j-u...@logging.apache.org>
> > Betreff: Re: ETA for 2.19.1?
> >
> > There have only been 2 issues fixed since 2.19.0 was released 2 months
> > ago.  I normally wouldn’t perform a release for so few non-critical
> changes
> > after such a short period of time.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Nov 10, 2022, at 1:10 AM, jeffrey.tho...@t-systems.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Hallo Log4j Team,
> > >
> > > any rough ETA on when a 2.19.1 release might take place?
> > >
> > > On one of my tickets I was told by the developer that you are all very
> > busy working on 3.x so I should give a shout out here for a little 2.x
> > love. 😊
> > >
> > > Cheers, Jeff
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> >
>

Reply via email to