Curious:

In the "classic" changelog, we use "add", "fix", and so on, simple enough.
Here, we use the past tense "added", and so on, except that we don't use
"secured", we use "security", an odd inconsistency I guess. Any reason for
that?

FWIW, I like the simpler shorter words "add" and so on.

Gary

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 05:55 Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote:

> The Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0 release is now available for voting.
>
> The 0.1.0 version is the very first release of this relatively old
> repository, which is repurposed for `log4j-changelog`, Log4j's
> `maven-changes-plugin` successor. This enables us to build the Log4j
> website (incl. manual) in less than 30 seconds and use multiple issue
> trackers, e.g., JIRA and GitHub Issues. All these Log4j improvements
> are already submitted as PRs against the `release-2.x` branch and
> waiting for this `log4j-tools` release.
>
> `log4j-changelog` README:
>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools/blob/master/log4j-changelog/README.adoc
>
> This release also constitutes another milestone in the history of ASF:
> *the very first release signed and deployed via CI.*
>
> Source repository: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
> Branch: release/0.1.0
> Commit: e82a44142280d013bd76ea18951fde00dcee192b
> CI run:
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools/actions/runs/3882476949
> Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j/
> Nexus repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1096
> Signing key:
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=077e8893a6dcc33dd4a4d5b256e73ba9a0b592d0&fingerprint=on&op=index
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the Log4j developers list.
>
> [ ] +1, release the artifacts
> [ ] -1, don't release, because...
>
> The vote will remain open for 24 hours (or more if required). All
> votes are welcome and we encourage everyone to test the release, but
> only the Logging Services PMC votes are officially counted. At least 3
> +1 votes and more positive than negative votes are required.
>

Reply via email to