+1

Ralph

> On Aug 24, 2023, at 4:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023, at 09:26, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>> Piotr shared a very good observation (in a private Slack post
>> <https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/C4TQW0M5L/p1692821047719209>) that
>> users ask questions in GitHub Issues, we point them to the mailing list,
>> and they disappear. See this ticket
>> <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1722> for an example.
>> Consequently, Matt proposed using GitHub Discussions. Robert added Pulser
>> already has it enabled <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions>. I
>> think many users are more keen on forums, GitHub, StackOverflow, etc. We
>> should position ourselves where our users expect us to be. In that
>> regard, *GitHub
>> Discussions sounds like a great idea and I propose experimenting with it*:
>> 
>>   - Enable GitHub Actions
>>   - Update our support page accordingly
>>   - Update README
>> 
>> One would think this should be a matter of a `.asf.yaml` one-liner, but 
>> it
>> is not
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=Git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-GitHubDiscussions>
>> :
>> 
>> *"GitHub Discussions is currently a beta feature and does not have an API
>> endpoint. Until this is addressed, please open an Infra Jira ticket with a
>> link to a consensus discussion thread for your project."*
>> 
>> 
>> Hence, *I need your approval in the form of a reply to this post*.

Reply via email to