I am OK with either version but the m.m.m one seems better to me. Gary
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 3:54 PM Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > Please don't! The entire versioning scheme in the IT universe is > already sophisticated enough. Let's stick to the good old school > `major.minor.patch` convention that every person and tool understands. > > I support Piotr's `2.21.1` proposal, since this is a "patch" for those > who download a GUI tool from Maven Central. > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:18 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > > Well, you cannot reuse the tag since you have to modify the pom.xml. You > could go with 2.21.0.1. > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Oct 17, 2023, at 5:24 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ralph, > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:58, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> Yes > > >> > > >> Ralph > > > > > > Same release number or 2.21.1? The `rel/2.21.0` tag on the repository > > > was already used by the faulty release. > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > >> > > >>> On Oct 17, 2023, at 4:31 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz < > piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:13, Piotr P. Karwasz < > piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:37, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui > 2.20.0 > > >>>>> compatible with log4j 2.21.0? > > >>>> > > >>>> Yes, it is, but there should be a `log4j-jmx-gui` version 2.21.0 > out there: > > >>>> > > >>>> > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-jmx-gui/releases/tag/rel%2F2.21.0 > > >>>> > > >>>> I am not sure why I can't find it on Maven Central. > > >>> > > >>> Due to a typo in the `pom.xml`, `log4j-jmx-gui` was published in the > > >>> `org.apache.logging` group. > > >>> Should we release it again with the correct Maven group? > > >>> > > >>> Piotr > > >> > > >
