So really, the question is whether we can make the generated service classes easier to create without annotation processing?
> On Oct 23, 2023, at 12:11 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Staying from the built-in Service Loader is a recipe for even more > custom code and complications. I say we stick with the built-in > Service Loader. > > Gary > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 5:01 PM Piotr P. Karwasz > <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 22:49, Matt Sicker <m...@musigma.org> wrote: >>> So now we come to your question about a factories file. That’s an >>> interesting idea, though it’s extremely similar to what we’re doing here >>> with ServiceLoader (though the split between META-INF/services/ files and >>> module-info.java provides/uses entries is confusing). Moving away from >>> ServiceLoader to a custom mechanism might be more flexible, though I’m not >>> very knowledgeable about how Java modules work with them. >> >> I think that `ServiceLoader` is the only standard feature that is >> supported by both OSGi and JPMS. If we move away from it, we'll need >> some custom code to support it (or `opens`, etc). I wouldn't go that >> way. >> >> Piotr
