The plan sounds good to me. I am only not comfortable with the workaround to #2065 <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2113>. In a nutshell, the way Coursier/Ivy derives the effective POM doesn't match the one Maven does. Only to make Coursier/Ivy work, we add redundant dependency declarations. I am not strongly against this unpleasant workaround, but I wonder if there is a better way? Could somebody else also weigh in, please?
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 5:46 PM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In the next days I would like to prepare a Log4j 2.22.1 patch release, > based on this milestone: > > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/milestone/10 > > Could you review the PRs attached? I am only waiting for a PR from a > user (for a "good-first-issue") and `logging-parent` 10.5.0 and I am > good to go. > > Piotr >
