On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 10:40, Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > > -1 on merging multiple websites to a single repository. > > I think documentation should reside in the same repository where sources > are. I already implemented this for *almost* every repository: > > logging-parent > logging-log4j-tools > logging-log4j-transform > logging-log4j-kotlin > logging-log4j-scala > logging-log4j-jakarta > > There is only one left to migrate to this scheme: `logging-log4j2`, which I > intend to do on February 9 during STF MS12. `logging-site`, `cyclonedx`, > `activity-monitor` are exceptions, since they are only websites, not source > code repositories. Hence, your statement of *"the way our website is > created from multiple repos and branches is somehow incoherent"* is untrue.
I am fine with this scheme if it becomes universal. Regarding `logging-log4j2`, we will probably need 2 pairs of website branches, so that we can publish `/log4j/2.x` and `/log4j/3.x` independently. The `/log4j` folder can be published from `logging-site`. Piotr
