Argh … yeah … sorry for that … indeed I missed that :-) Thanks for clarifying.
Chris Von: Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> Datum: Freitag, 15. März 2024 um 17:49 An: dev@logging.apache.org <dev@logging.apache.org> Cc: cd...@apache.org <cd...@apache.org> Betreff: Re: [Feedback] Personal feedback on you last vote on Log4j 2.23.1 I responded to the VOTE email, stated "Adding my +1", and changed the subject to `[RESULT][VOTE]`: https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbvg5kx3mkw4vhyp13rxlojtkrpyzsdk Could it be that you missed my +1 due to the subject change? On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:39 PM Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org<mailto:cd...@apache.org>> wrote: Hi all, while going through the projects latest activity activity as part of my preparation for next week's board meeting, I came across a vote that was announced successfull even if only 2 votes were cast. I assume that the RM (Volkan) implicitly counted his vote as +1, but we do actually need a formal vote, as there is no such thing as an implicit vote. If you actively don't want to cast a separate vote, then please just add something down the line of "This email also counts as my +1 vote" or so. I just voted -1 on my latest PLC4X RC ... so I would strongly encourage the RM to explicitly cast a vote. And for this case ... we actually do need one last formal binding +1 vote. So it would be cool if someone who has not yet voted, could take care of that. Thanks, Chris PS: Please keep me in CC as I'm not subscribed to this list.
