I'm sorry for being unclear! What I mean is that the current code built
on 8 will behave and perform identically to the current code built on 17.
Is that correct?
John
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:04 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
>
>
> > On May 30, 2024, at 7:43 AM, John Engebretson <jengebr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree on the complexity argument - and FWIW we still have many apps on
> > JDK 8 and are intimidated by the Spring upgrade, so I understand that.
> :)
> > Sounds like we agree there's no runtime impact?
> > John
> >
>
> I am not sure what you mean there. We are now building 2.x with JDK 17 but
> targeting JDK 8. With 3.x we can take advantage of anything added in JDK 11
> or 17 so that could have a runtime impact.
>
> Ralph
>
>
