I agree that compatibility is paramount for 2.x 😀 Gary
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024, 12:22 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I have been working on creating log4j-context-data. My plan was to remove > stuff from Log4j API after I have something workable. Even though 2.24.0 > won’t include log4j-context-data I want to make sure that what we are > leaving will be compatible. > > Ralph > > > On Jun 20, 2024, at 4:15 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I lost track of where we are after our video discussion regarding all the > > scoped classes and 2.24.0. Where are we on those? > > > > Also, can we get information on what happened with the conference call > > regarding the (IMO bad) idea on conditional testing? I sure hope we're > not > > using it. > > > > Gary > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2024, 12:27 PM Matt Sicker <m...@musigma.org> wrote: > > > >> Probably discussions about the ScopedContext API in general. > >> > >>> On May 26, 2024, at 14:49, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On May 26, 2024, at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier < > grobme...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, May 25, 2024, at 04:22, Gary Gregory wrote: > >>>>> I'd like to have the PMC meet to review and discuss ScopedContext, > >>>>> which I am not caught up on, and whatever else we should chat about. > >>>> > >>>> Me too. > >>>> > >>>> I feel that all the discussion on the ScopedContext should be in an > >> experimental branch or an additional jar file rather than the stable > code > >> base. > >>>> > >>>> I see it popping up so often, I start to believe it's "not there yet.” > >>> > >>> See what popping up so often? > >>> > >>> Ralph > >> > >> > >
