We do not test the module path. "Among the problems that tools like BND or Moditect might"
So? Then we or others report and fix those tools. If moditect does not work 100% it's no reason to do all this JPMS junk manually. These are all open source tools, so we can all play nicely together and report and fix issues. Since I've not heard of problems from people asking for JPMS with our new jars, i can only assume it works for them. Gary On Fri, Aug 9, 2024, 2:00 PM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gary, > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 15:24, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've had many requests to support JPMS in Commons and none that I recall > > since I've been releasing jars using Moditect, so I can only assume it > > works well enough. My impression is that people only care to get rid of > > warnings or errors to run an app. > > Is there any Commons project that runs tests on the modulepath? > > Among the problems that tools like BND or Moditect might miss are: > > * missing `uses` directives, > * optional dependencies that are `transitive`, > * reflective access from some third-party library that doesn't have > the right permissions. > > Piotr >
