Thanks Piotr. It is good to know this as I often have lots of source code and build from various things on my computer.
Ralph > On Sep 3, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Volkan, > > On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 20:54, Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci.invalid> wrote: >> My point is, 3 people verified the release and CI runs passed on all 3 >> platforms – there is definitely something unexpected in your setup. As you >> know better, issuing an RC is a time and energy consuming task. Besides RM, >> other voters put effort into it too. Would you mind asking for further help >> instead of downvoting a release due to local failures, please? I would have >> been more than happy to assist you in a video call, instead of re-issuing >> the whole release. > > The call to cancel the vote was mine, since the -1 is not a veto. > > That said, please consider that: > > * Around 10% of all builds fail due to a test. You can find a list of > broken tests on Develocity[1] and try to fix them. > * The SBOM is generated based on the dependencies in your local Maven > repo. If you happen to be the Release Manager of some of Log4j > dependencies, you might have some pre-releases and RCs in the repo > instead of the official versions. > > Piotr > > [1] > https://ge.apache.org/scans/tests?search.relativeStartTime=P28D&search.rootProjectNames=Apache%20Log4j%20BOM&search.timeZoneId=Europe%2FWarsaw#
