Hi Gary,
On 3.11.2024 13:23, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:15 PM Ralph Goers<ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
I think you missed my point. I don’t think Log4j-core, Logback or whatever
should need to implement anything. The point of such an API is to provide a
standard API that implements whatever is necessary to perform the action.
i.e. in Log4j’s case setLEvel would call Configurator.setLevel.
I like Ralph's POV. We define the API, and since we have our core
implementations and bridges for other logging systems, we put the new code
in there.
I merged everything into a single artifact and applied your other
suggestions[1]. If we more or less agree on how this should look like, I
can create an `apache/logging-admin` repo and work out the details in PRs.
Piotr
[1] https://github.com/ppkarwasz/logging-admin
