Gary,
On 25.10.2024 08:19, Ralph Goers wrote:
With the changes that have been made the bridges only have a dependency on
Logj4 API - which is only in the 2.x branch. Should these artifacts only be on
the 2.x branch as well?
These bridges don’t change nearly as often as core or even api do. IMO
releasing them with every release doesn’t make a lot of sense. To be honest, I
would have suggested that the API and everything that is only dependent on the
API (except for core) be in a separate repo with its own release schedule. This
would match pretty much what SLF4J does.
Are you suggesting that the bridges be included in both 2.x and main? Are you
suggesting that the bridges MUST be versioned the same as 2.x despite them
almost never having any changes?
I’m simply trying to understand what your rationale is here.
Can you address Ralph's remarks? Where do you propose the bridges should
stay:
* on both the `2.x` and `main` branches,
* on only the `2.x` branch,
* in a separate repo with a separate release schedule.
Piotr
