Hi Daniel,

On 17.03.2025 15:19, Daniel Burrell wrote:
Is a maintainer available to cut this 3.0.0 release? I believe a vote has
to be called?

Since January no maintainer can contribute to Log4j as part of their dayjob, so the development of Log4j has been processing at an extremely slow pace. Optimistically we can dedicate maybe 8 hours a week to the project counting all maintainers. This time is often spent on answering issue reports, but we are working on a way to make the queue of our maintainer tasks and especially their order more transparent.

Personally my priorities right now are:

1. Release Log4j Transform 0.3.0, which has a converter between configuration formats that I think will be the most useful to users.

2. Release Log4j 2.25.0, which is 3 months overdue and often requested by GraalVM users.

3. Port changes introduced in 2.25.0 to 3.x: there is a long list of features and fixes that we didn't have time to add to 3.x[1]. GraalVM support is probably the biggest one[2] and is required to pass our integration tests.


So realistically, I don't think a release of 3.x will happen before the end of April.

[1] https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3161

[2] https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3055

I would refer to the discussion thread where I raised this originally in
December, but this has been disabled on github repo for some reason.

Discussions disappeared due to a major upgrade of the tools used by Apache INFRA. INFRA informed us of this possibility and we reenabled Discussions.

Piotr

Reply via email to