As discussed earlier[1][2], I want to call a vote to retire[3] the Log4j Scala API sub-project[4].
Please vote: [] +1, retire Log4j Scala API [] -1, don't retire Log4j Scala API, because... Per Apache Voting Process[5], this is a "procedural issue", and it follows the simple majority[6]. That is, if there are more +1 votes than -1 ones, the issue is considered to have passed — regardless of the number of votes in each category. PMC members have formally binding votes, but I encourage all community members to vote, even if their votes are only advisory. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1ktc1qxgwtnqd3zpshk017zfzfgkvp25 [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/discussions/4021 [3] https://logging.apache.org/processes.html [4] https://logging.apache.org/log4j/scala [5] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html [6] https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#SimpleMajority
