Hi Gary, On 1.07.2026 17:44, Gary Gregory wrote: > That's like us putting our cart before the horse.
I'd rather look at it as laying the foundation before building the house. By the way, this is something I'd like to propose for Commons too: if we have people willing to vote on an LTS release alongside the newest one, I am willing to stage those releases. I know both Commons and Log4j are backward compatible, so in theory users could stay on whatever version they have today and only upgrade when a vulnerability appears. In practice, though, every bug fix and small change breaks someone's use case, so it's safer to keep users concentrated on a single LTS release and apply as few patches as possible. Piotr
