This is odd -- can you post the exception that the 2.4.1/2.9.2 CheckIndex reports?
Mike On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi- > > I am investigating a corrupted index. One segment has a term that is > somehow corrupted. The stored fields and term vectors are fine. > > The 2.4.1 and 2.9.2 versions of CheckIndex report this problem. The > CheckIndex on trunk does not report this problem, and is much faster. > Did some error-checking get dropped from CheckIndex? > > Note that this is against a 2.4 format index, so if that is the > difference it may not be worth fixing. > > Lance Norskog > > -- > Lance Norskog > [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
