+0.9

What are the requirements of me, "Joe Committer" and of "Joe Contributor" in 
regards to submitting/committing patches?

For Joe Committer, am I required to put everything on stable and trunk or can I 
just pick trunk and if someone else wants it they do stable or vice versa?

Likewise for Joe Contributor, must I generate two patches now?


On Apr 26, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:

> This is exactly the intention behind the proposal we are voting on.
> 
> Big changes, that'd be destabilizing if attempted on the stable
> branch, would be done only on unstable (= trunk).
> 
> More "normal" changes, which can still include deprecations/some back
> compat, would be done on the stable branch and unstable.
> 
> So, eg, rather than attempt back compat for a big change like flex, we
> would instead do it only in unstable and it'd first become "available"
> in the next .0 release.
> 
> By segregating the big changes away from stable we should be able to
> keep stronger back compat on stable.  We also save our resources not
> building costly back compat layers that, because of their complexity,
> bring their own problems.  Also, our release numbers are more
> "standard" -- the .0 release will have major changes (unlike today
> where is has no changes except removal of deprecations).
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/26/10 2:43 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>> 
>>> My best guess: that what this is really suggesting is that "trunk"
>>> *always*  be targeted at the next "major" release (ie: 4.0, 5.0, 6.0,
>>> etc...) and that development of minor releases (ie: 3.2, 3.3, ...; 4.1.,
>>> 4.2, etc...) happen on "more stable" branches off of the major version
>>> release branches (ie: branch_3_0 forks off trunk when 3.0 is release,
>>> branch_3_1 forks off branch_3_0 when 3.1 releases, etc...)
>> 
>> This is what I would like. Not sure if that's what will come from the
>> current proposal or not, but seems so to me.
>> 
>> --
>> - Mark
>> 
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to