[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-397:
--------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-397.patch

Spurred on by recent email threads about this, i sat down and got the 
previously mentioned design working (with tests!)

this patch implements the "facet.date.include" param mentioned about with the 
specified semantics.  the only change is that i discovered 
facet.date.other=before and facet.date.other=after don't currently included the 
start/end (respectively) range boundaries ... so i made the default for 
facet.date.include be [lower,upper,edge] for back compatibility.

I think this approach makes more sense then the proposal in SOLR-1402 because 
these semantics make it easy to always get a series of ranges (including the 
before/after ranges) that are "adjacent" w/o overlapping (using either [lower], 
[lower,edge], [upper], or [upper,edge])

> options for dealing with range endpoints in date facets
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-397
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>         Attachments: SOLR-397.patch
>
>
> Date faceting should support configuration for controlling how edge 
> boundaries are dealt with.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to