On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Michael McCandless
<[email protected]> wrote:
> But... we probably should do this after we switch to sorting terms by
> unicode code point order?  (LUCENE-2426)

So perhaps we should define this in terms of Lucene's default index
order instead... so it could be UTF16 order for now, and switch to
code-point / unsigned byte order when the index format does?

-Yonik
Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010
18-21 May 2010 | Prague

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to