Hi DIGY,

Explain me how can I help.
Where are the java codes that needs to be ported to .NET?

Leo

2010/5/10 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com>

> Hi All,
> 2.9.2 tag is created.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 3:23 AM
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Lucene.Net 2.9.3
>
> +1 for the tag
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 5:20 PM
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Lucene.Net 2.9.3
>
> Hi All,
>
> In order to create a 2.9.2 tag, I plan to wait
>
>                till LUCENENET-358 is fixed,
>
> and
>
>                at least one of the other commiters post a   +1
>
>
>
> DIGY
>
>
>
> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:17 PM
> To: 'lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: Lucene.Net 2.9.3
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Issues related with lucene.Java 2.9.3
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12314799)
>
> have started to be fixed in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src
>
>
>
> What should be the next step for Lucene.Net?
>
> Creating a 2.9.2 tag and porting those fixes to current trunk?
>
>
>
> DIGY
>
>
>

Reply via email to