On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>wrote:
> > yeah ... totally understandable, like i said i just hadn't noticed it -- > you'll get no objection from me if you want to backport it. > ok i will look at merging this one later tonight / tomorrow unless someone pipes up. > : One alternative instead of merging those fixes would be to document a > : recommendation to just use -D's from the jvm to ensure US locale, since > we > : know others are problematic. > > Hmmm ... yeah, that seems like it might be safer (aren't there still > some outstanding default Locale issues anyway? ... particularly in DIH?) > > it would probably be good advice for any old (1.1-1.4) users as well ... > lets just document the workaround for this one in the CHANGES? Solr wiki? In this case Lucene 2.9.x is actually OK, it was only newer 3.x code that had problems. -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
