[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12877806#action_12877806
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2469:
-------------------------------------

This should be in the Solr JIRA, not Lucene

> inconsistency in SolrParams.get()
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2469
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2469
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Other
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Frank Wesemann
>
> The returned value from solrParams.get( key ) depends on the implementing 
> class such that:
> {code}
> modifiableParams = new ModifiableSolrParams( req.getParams() );
> assert modifiableParams.get("key").equals( req.getParams().get("key") );
> {code}
> fails for requests built from a SimpleRequestParser or StandardRequestParser 
> where the parameter "key" was given, but empty ( e.g. 
> localhost:8393/select/?key=&para1=val1&parm2=val2 ). 
> The reason is that oas.request.ServletSolrParams returns null for values with 
> length() == 0,
> but all other SolrParams implementations return the empty String.
> This behaviour has also side effects on search components:
> Most, if not all, standard search components check for something like
> if (reg.getParams().getBool(myTriggerParameter, false) ) {
>    ...do what I am supposed to do...
> }
> In case of ServletSolrParams getBool() returns the desired and expected 
> "false", all other Implementations throw a "bad request" Exception. 
> One may argue that suppling a parameter with an empty value indeed is a 
> malformed request, ... 
> Nonetheless I think, the above mentioned equality check should hold true for 
> any request and any SolrParams. 
> Because I cannot oversee the implications, I currently don't have a better 
> suggestion to achieve this, than
> to make ServleSolrParams also return the empty String, which is in my opinion 
> counter-intuitive and does not the right thing for the getBool(), getInt() 
> etc. cases. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to