: > +0 ... i'd prefer to keep the solr.war as lite as possible, with as few : > dependencies as possible -- so alowing for lazy loaded respose writers : > seems like a better choice to me -- but i recognize that there are : > size/feature trade offs. : : There are advantages though - being able to replace the JSP pages with : something more malleable and potentially overridable. And it's really not : that heavy weight.
absolutely -- there are always trade offs, hence i am not opposed (although to repeat an early comment from jira: i'd still rather move towards the Admin UI being impled entirely with request handler XML response and browser side XSLT then with velocity -- that way we can be *sure* that our request handlers are exposing *everything* needed to power the admin UI, so it's all available programaticly as well) -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
