[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-1240:
---------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-1240.patch

Updated patch.  I think this may be ready to commit.

Changes to previous patch...


* fixed a bug in one test where i was ignoring the fieldName
* move "metadata" info a new sub NamedList called "meta" - something that was 
kinda overlooked with date faceting was the co-mingling of facet counts (named 
after the low point of the range) with other metadata -- which is extra ugly 
now that things like 'gap' and 'end' can also be of type "int".  since this 
facet_range section is all new it doesn't need to have the exact same structure 
as facet_date, so i think we should clean it up and keep the "range" counts 
distinct from the other metadata
* made it support all of the Sortable(Number)Field types, refactored the tests 
to verify this.
* make it support Date fields directly -- this means you can use 
facet.range=dateFieldName&facet.range.start=NOW/MONTH&facet.range.gap=... and 
the "date" type faceting will show up in the "facet_ranges" section.  the old 
"facet.date" stuff still works -- but all that code is duplicated, and not 
shared (yet)
* refactored existing date faceting tests to both  facet.range and facet.date 
usage (which was kind of a pain combined with the "meta" change -- but it  
works)

feedback would definitely be appreciated


> Numerical Range faceting
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1240
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: search
>            Reporter: Gijs Kunze
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, 
> SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch, SOLR-1240.patch
>
>
> For faceting numerical ranges using many facet.query query arguments leads to 
> unmanageably large queries as the fields you facet over increase. Adding the 
> same faceting parameter for numbers which already exists for dates should fix 
> this.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to