sounds nasty... its good you are running the tests with this different jvm...
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tried to run it w/ SUN JRE6 and it succeeds ! I've tried several times and > it succeeds every time. However, when I revert back to IBM's, it fail > immediately. > > I can help w/ the debug, if you give me a hint where to look :). > > Shai > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sorry for the delayed response. >> >> I ran it a couple more times, from Eclipse and Ant, and each time it fails >> (amazing !), w/ different seeds. More seeds that fail: >> NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: >> -4244174191361080127 >> NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: >> -7059086272401721644 >> NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: >> -1314734215611104147 >> >> I use IBM JVM, tried w/ both 1.5 and 1.6 ... >> >> Mike, can we use LUCENE-2565 to track this, or would you prefer that I >> open a separate one? >> >> Shai >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Michael McCandless < >> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> >>> On a more general note... >>> >>> Any time any of you out there hit an "odd" test failure, please please >>> please do just what Shai did: take it to the dev list! >>> >>> Think of Lucene's unit tests like SETI :) We are desperately seeking >>> bugs, and you and your machine may just be lucky enough to find one... >>> go forth and buy expensive new power hungry computers just so you can >>> run the random tests over and over, seeking the bugs! >>> >>> But be sure to include that random seed when you do hit a failure... >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I agree, Shai can you open a bug? I cannot reproduce, did you use an >>> IBM JVM >>> > or another environment that might help us figure it out? >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Michael McCandless >>> > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hmmm this means a bug is lurking. This is the power of random testing >>> >> (that every time we all run tests, we're testing different "paths" >>> >> through the code).... >>> >> >>> >> It seems exceptionally unlikely that LUCENE-2537's changes would cause >>> >> this! >>> >> >>> >> But, unfortunately, when I plug that seed in I don't see it fail, >>> >> which is odd. I'll run a stress test to see if I can tickle the >>> >> bug... can you open a Jira issue so we don't lose track? >>> >> >>> >> Mike >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > Hi >>> >> > >>> >> > I was running tests on trunk (after merging the changes from >>> >> > LUCENE-2537) >>> >> > and received this error message: >>> >> > >>> >> > expected:<true> but was:<false> >>> >> > >>> >> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: >>> >> > at >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestUTF32ToUTF8.assertAutomaton(TestUTF32ToUTF8.java:197) >>> >> > at >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestUTF32ToUTF8.testRandomRegexes(TestUTF32ToUTF8.java:170) >>> >> > at >>> >> > >>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare(LuceneTestCase.java:285) >>> >> > >>> >> > NOTE: random seed of testcase 'testRandomRegexes' was: >>> >> > 3510820306304573866 >>> >> > >>> >> > I'm sure it's related to my changes. Has anyone else seen this >>> before? >>> >> > >>> >> > Shai >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Robert Muir >>> > rcm...@gmail.com >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >> > -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
