[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12896406#action_12896406
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2589:
-----------------------------------------
{quote}Actually i would prefer we just fix LuceneTestCase etc so that each test
class has a single static random seed, then there would be less parameters.
Then we can change the failure message to just say 'reproduce with -D....' and
I think it would be best.{quote}
A single random seed per TestCase / Class would make things way easier IMO and
I would agree that we should have that per Class. Nevertheless, would that
deprecate all parameters? When I want to use randomized tests but need to force
a certain codec that wouldn't work. Anyway, a documentation of whatever we do
here would help people new to lucene to get started with patches and test.
> Add a variable-sized int block codec
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2589
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2589
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2589.patch, LUCENE-2589.patch
>
>
> We already have support for fixed block size int block codecs, making it very
> simple to create a codec from a int encoder algorithms like FOR/PFOR.
> But algorithms like Simple9/16 are not fixed -- they encode a variable number
> of adjacent ints at once, depending on the specific values of those ints.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
