[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Toke Eskildsen updated LUCENE-2369:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-2369.patch

Preliminary patch with the primary purpose of testing the viability of this 
issue.

Create a Lucene flex index (Version.40+) and call
java -cp build/lucene-core-4.0-dev.jar 
org.apache.lucene.search.exposed.poc.ExposedPOC
to test.

> Locale-based sort by field with low memory overhead
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2369
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2369
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Toke Eskildsen
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2369.patch
>
>
> The current implementation of locale-based sort in Lucene uses the FieldCache 
> which keeps all sort terms in memory. Beside the huge memory overhead, 
> searching requires comparison of terms with collator.compare every time, 
> making searches with millions of hits fairly expensive.
> This proposed alternative implementation is to create a packed list of 
> pre-sorted ordinals for the sort terms and a map from document-IDs to entries 
> in the sorted ordinals list. This results in very low memory overhead and 
> faster sorted searches, at the cost of increased startup-time. As the 
> ordinals can be resolved to terms after the sorting has been performed, this 
> approach supports fillFields=true.
> This issue is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2335 
> which contain previous discussions on the subject.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to