[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909160#action_12909160
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-1900:
------------------------------------------
I think it makes sense to move append to BytesRef, though I wonder if it should
it over-allocate (ArrayUtil.oversize) when it grows? I realize for the current
calls to append we don't need that (you just append bigTerm, once), but if
someone uses this like a StringBuffer... though, this isn't really the
intention of BytesRef, so maybe it's OK to not oversize.
> move Solr to flex APIs
> ----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1900
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1900
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1900-facet_enum.patch, SOLR-1900-facet_enum.patch,
> SOLR-1900_bigTerm.txt, SOLR-1900_FileFloatSource.patch,
> SOLR-1900_termsComponent.txt
>
>
> Solr should use flex APIs
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
