[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12914486#action_12914486
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2662:
-----------------------------------------
bq. We need to factor it out of THPF otherwise this patch isn't really useful
for committing. Also, it'll get tested through the entirety of the unit tests,
ie, it'll get put through the laundry.
Yeah, lets see this as the first baby step towards it. I will move ByteBockPool
to o.a.l.utils and start cutting THPF over to it. We need to do benchmarking in
any case just to make sure JIT doesn't play nasty tricks with us again.
simon
> BytesHash
> ---------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: Realtime Branch, 4.0
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Realtime Branch, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch
>
>
> This issue will have the BytesHash separated out from LUCENE-2186
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
