[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12914579#action_12914579
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2665:
--------------------------------------------
bq. I'm reading Mikes list as stuff we should keep in mind as we start a new
direction.
Exactly -- we certainly don't have to get this done on the first baby
step, but if we're gonna make big changes to FC now, we should have
this future target/issues-to-fix in mind.
In fact I'm fine w/ the original baby step of sticking the Bits config
onto Parser, as long as it doesn't use static config nor risk added
insanity...
> Rework FieldCache to be more flexible/general
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2665
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Attachments: LUCENE-2665-FieldCacheOverhaul.patch
>
>
> The existing FieldCache implementation is very rigid and does not allow much
> flexibility. In trying to implement simple features, it points to much
> larger structural problems.
> This patch aims to take a fresh approach to how we work with the FieldCache.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
