On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Simon Willnauer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> True, but that still helps to find those little things that come out
>> if you run on trunk which can be fixed earlier. I don't think that
>> shooting those build mails to the dev list makes any sense. it should
>> go to individuals working on that branch.
>
> I don't think it should send private emails.
>
>> We have the infrastructure why not running such a build a on commit
>> and once or twice a day... I don't see any reason why we shouldn't
>>
>
> one or twice a day, this is different than 24/7.  Then again, building
> on commit for a branch with one guy working on it (especially since i
> don't see a particularly large amount of commits going to any
> branches) seems overkill: that person could just run ant test
> themselves.

I don't think hitting "copy job" and change the url is near any
overkill but I can simply start my hudson boxes again to run the
branch tests.
>
> And at the moment, I have trouble understanding how this would be
> really helpful since trunk/branch-3x itself are not even yet stable
> with regards to tests...

as helpful as it is for branch-3x IMO but I don't have too strong
feelings about it though.

simon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to