Whoa, thanks for catching this Uwe! On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why did you change this at all? I would revert or fix as described. Because the current impl is wasteful, ie it does one too many .next() calls. I like your fix (move up the count/cache)... I'll commit. BTW this count is only for debugging/transparency right? Ie so you can see how many terms were visited during MTQ rewrite. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
