[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923430#action_12923430
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2618:
------------------------------------
Ok Mike, that makes sense. You want to allow optimize() to finish all possible
merges. Why then not let regular merges finish all the way through, even if
we're closing? I mean, the application wants to wait for all running merges, so
why is optimize() different than maybeMerge()?
> Intermittent failure in 3.x's backwards TestThreadedOptimize
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2618
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2618
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2618.patch
>
>
> Failure looks like this:
> {noformat}
> [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize
> [junit] Testcase:
> testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize): FAILED
> [junit] null
> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null
> [junit] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOptimize.java:125)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(TestThreadedOptimize.java:149)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare(LuceneTestCase.java:253)
> {noformat}
> I just committed some verbosity so next time it strikes we'll have more
> details.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
