This is a test i'm familiar with, but the failure is aparently an 
assertion in IndexWriter._mergeInit that should probably get some more 
eyeballs on it...

(Note: this is apparently 4x as of r1556643)

: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/8922/
: Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b02 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.TestDistribDocBasedVersion

        ...

: Stack Trace:
: com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.UncaughtExceptionError: Captured an 
uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=4981, name=Lucene Merge Thread #0, 
state=RUNNABLE, group=TGRP-TestDistribDocBasedVersion]
: Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException: 
java.lang.AssertionError
:       at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([791402573DC76F3C]:0)
:       at 
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.handleMergeException(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:545)
:       at 
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler$MergeThread.run(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:518)
: Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError
:       at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter._mergeInit(IndexWriter.java:3807)
:       at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.mergeInit(IndexWriter.java:3791)
:       at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.merge(IndexWriter.java:3644)
:       at 
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.doMerge(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:405)
:       at 
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler$MergeThread.run(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:482)

If i'm reading this right, as of r1556643 the assertion that tripped was 
"assert merge.registerDone;" ...

https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java?revision=r1556643&view=markup#l3807

Any idea what could cause that assertion to fail?


-Hoss
http://www.lucidworks.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to