[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931041#action_12931041
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2754:
---------------------------------------
What about the third BQ rewrite mode (is it needed or is scoring different (we
have two rerwite modes for fuzzy)?
> add spanquery support for all multitermqueries
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2754
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2754
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2754.patch
>
>
> I set fix version: 4.0, but possibly we could do this for 3.x too
> Currently, we have a special SpanRegexQuery in contrib, and issues like
> LUCENE-522 open for SpanFuzzyQuery.
> The SpanRegexQuery in contrib is a little messy additionally.
> For any arbitrary MultiTermQueries to work as a SpanQuery, there are only 3
> requirements:
> # The un-rewritten query must extend SpanQuery so it can be included in Span
> clauses
> # The rewritten query should be SpanOrQuery instead of BooleanQuery
> # The rewritten term clauses should be SpanTermQueries.
> Instead of having logic like this for each query, i suggest adding two
> rewrite methods:
> * ScoringSpanBoolean rewrite
> * TopTermsSpanBoolean rewrite
> as a start i wrote these up, and added a SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper that can
> be used to wrap any multitermquery this way.
> there are a few kinks, but I think the MTQ policeman can probably help get
> through them.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
