[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882719#comment-13882719
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2366:
-----------------------------------
bq. So for a facet.range.start=0, facet.range.end=1000,
facet.range.gap=10,90,900 the labels would be as Jan suggests: [0 TO 10}, [10
TO 100}, [100 TO 1000}.
[~tedsullivan], I am not in favor of a list of relative gaps, I think it is
user unfriendly. That's why I suggested a new facet.range.spec or something
like Hoss' facet.range.buckets. But if you for some reason wish to extend the
"gap" parameter, I guess it needs to remain relative gaps since that is kind of
implied in the wording?
> Facet Range Gaps
> ----------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2366
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.7
>
> Attachments: SOLR-2366.patch, SOLR-2366.patch, SOLR-2366.patch
>
>
> There really is no reason why the range gap for date and numeric faceting
> needs to be evenly spaced. For instance, if and when SOLR-1581 is completed
> and one were doing spatial distance calculations, one could facet by function
> into 3 different sized buckets: walking distance (0-5KM), driving distance
> (5KM-150KM) and everything else (150KM+), for instance. We should be able to
> quantize the results into arbitrarily sized buckets.
> (Original syntax proposal removed, see discussion for concrete syntax)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
