[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13904947#comment-13904947
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5447:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1569586 from [~steve_rowe] in branch 'dev/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1569586 ]

LUCENE-5447: StandardTokenizer should break at consecutive chars matching 
Word_Break = MidLetter, MidNum and/or MidNumLet

> StandardTokenizer should break at consecutive chars matching Word_Break = 
> MidLetter, MidNum and/or MidNumLet
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5447
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5447
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: modules/analysis
>    Affects Versions: 4.6.1
>            Reporter: Steve Rowe
>            Assignee: Steve Rowe
>             Fix For: 4.7, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5447-test.patch, LUCENE-5447.patch, 
> LUCENE-5447.patch
>
>
> StandardTokenizer should split all of the following sequences into two tokens 
> each, but they are all instead kept intact and output as single tokens:
> {noformat}
> "A::B"           (':' is in \p{Word_Break = MidLetter})
> "1..2", "A..B"   ('.' is in \p{Word_Break = MidNumLet})
> "A.:B"
> "A:.B"
> "1,,2"           (',' is in \p{Word_Break = MidNum})
> "1,.2"
> "1.,2"
> {noformat}
> Unfortunately, the word break test data released with Unicode, e.g. for 
> Unicode 6.3 
> [http://www.unicode.org/Public/6.3.0/ucd/auxiliary/WordBreakTest.txt], and 
> incorporated into a versioned Lucene test, e.g. 
> {{WordBreakTestUnicode_6_3_0}}, doesn't cover these cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to