this makes sense mark - I will keep on building the RC3

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nice last minute catch!
>
> Since we have not doc’d SSL support yet, a user could work around via just 
> setting the scheme manually in zk.
>
> As it’s not a regression and there is a fairly simple workaround, I’d be -0 
> on a respin for it. SSL becomes possible for the few that need it and we can 
> improve / fix it in a future release.
>
>
> - Mark
>
> http://about.me/markrmiller
>
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> SOLR-3854 seems to be incomplete . It relies on a CLuster-wide property 
>> called urlScheme. These properties needs to be whitelisted at the 
>> OverseerCollectionProcessor.KNOWN_CLUSTER_PROPS
>>
>>
>> The testcase directly writes the property to ZK . A norma user would only 
>> use the API
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Simon Willnauer 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> yeah we manually do svn merge per commit so at this stage only bugs
>> should be ported. Feature wise we are set!
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> simon
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> > I get it. You're cherry-picking changes onto the rel branch. No,
>> > there's absolutely no reason to imagine grabbing 5449.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> Noble Paul
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to