[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933070#action_12933070
 ] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2762:
------------------------------------------

{quote}I think we should improve our default MP.  First, maybe we should set a 
maxMergeMB by default?{quote}

That's a good idea, however would we set an absolute size or a size relative to 
the aggregate size of the index?  I'm using 5 GB in production as otherwise I'm 
not sure the merge cost is worth the potential performance improvement, ie, 
long merges adversely affects indexing performance.

> Don't leak deleted open file handles with pooled readers
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2762
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2762
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.4, 3.0.3, 3.1, 4.0
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2762.patch
>
>
> If you have CFS enabled today, and pooling is enabled (either directly
> or because you've pulled an NRT reader), IndexWriter will hold open
> SegmentReaders against the non-CFS format of each merged segment.
> So even if you close all NRT readers you've pulled from the writer,
> you'll still see file handles open against files that have been
> deleted.
> This count will not grow unbounded, since it's limited by the number
> of segments in the index, but it's still a serious problem since the
> app had turned off CFS in the first place presumably to avoid risk of
> too-many-open-files.  It's also bad because it ties up disk space
> since these files would otherwise be deleted.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to