[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13947954#comment-13947954
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-64:
----------------------------------
Nowadays, people get hierarchical faceting via either Pivot Faceting (easiest)
or via a little bit of clever tokenization with facet.prefix as described [by
Grant's recent
article|http://searchhub.org/2014/02/07/easy-hierarchical-faceting-and-display-with-solr-and-jquery-and-a-tiny-bit-of-python/]
which is similar if not the same as described in [the
wiki|http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting] by Hoss. I *do* think
there's a need for built-in hierarchical faceting, if for nothing else but ease
of use by users, but I'm skeptical it's with the code in SOLR-64. Ales, can
you tell us why those approaches are unsuitable?
> strict hierarchical facets
> --------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-64
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: search
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 4.8
>
> Attachments: SOLR-64.patch, SOLR-64.patch, SOLR-64.patch,
> SOLR-64.patch, SOLR-64_3.1.0.patch
>
>
> Strict Facet Hierarchies... each tag has at most one parent (a tree).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
