Tracked in SOLR-5948 so we don't lose the logs due ot jenkins job 
expiration...

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5948


: Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:56:19 -0700 (MST)
: From: Chris Hostetter <[email protected]>
: To: [email protected]
: Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_51) - Build #
:      3917 - Failure!
: 
: 
: This is a new test (committed yesterday) but it does't create/write/modify 
: any files on disk directly -- just using the regular distributed test 
: setup.
: 
: Can anyone with a windows machine reproduce this failure to cleanup the 
: workspace?
: 
: : 1 tests failed. FAILED:  
: : 
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest
: : 
: : Error Message: !!!! WARNING: best effort to remove 
: : 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\.\solrtest-DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest-1396449841389
 
: : FAILED !!!!!
: 
: Possibly related is that at one point one node attempts to do log replay 
: and encounteres a "FileNotFoundException: _0.si" ... no idea why/how that 
: could happen, but it definitley smells fishy.  And of course: right after 
: the FNFE start, we start seeing lots of 500 errors from other nodes trying 
: to communicate with this node whose index is missing files.
: 
: 
: 
: 
: (FWIW: There's also an NPE getting logged here indicating that there is no 
: Leader at one point with the processor runs.  That NPE shouldn't have 
: caused any sort of problem -- it's in an islated Runable that logs the 
: error and ignores -- but i'll fix the code to be more careful.  In 
: anycase, the lack of a leader at that point may be indicitive of some 
: underlying problem that also then lead to the FNFE and ultimatley the 
: cleanup failure?
: 
: 
: 
: -Hoss
: http://www.lucidworks.com/
: 

-Hoss
http://www.lucidworks.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to