Hi, > However, I think we should back-port LUCENE-5570 to 4.7.2, especially given > that 4.7.2 is the last release Java 1.6 users can use, I do think it's > important to > fix bugs there. > > Uwe, are you very strongly against fixing that issue on 4.7.2?
I am -0 here. This issue just makes debugging harder, but causes no bugs or data corrumption, so we should not add stuff that cannot be solved natively with Java 6. LUCENE-5574 is the real issue, LUCENE-5570 was just confusing to those who tried to understand the bug. But as the bug is fixed, no need to fix the side-effect of 0 byte files. Uwe > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > > Artifacts are located here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_7_2_r158577 > > 8/ > > > > +1 from me: > > > > SUCCESS! [0:49:41.525797] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
